Ad code

Casey Anthony Juror #3 Speaks!! "I did not say she was innocent" UPDATED w/ VIDEO!

Disclosure: Some of the links below are affiliate links. If you choose to purchase after clicking a link, we may receive a commission.
This juror says Casey wasn't innocent....so why is she set to walk out of jail tomorrow?

One of the Florida jurors who acquitted Casey Anthony of killing her 2-year-old daughter said Wednesday she doesn't necessarily think the monster mom is "innocent."

Prosecutors failed to pin the crime on her, juror Jennifer Ford said...but she also says,

"I did not say she was innocent."
Ford, otherwise known as Juror Number 3, went on to explain,

"I just said there was not enough evidence. If you cannot prove what the crime was, you cannot determine what the punishment should be."
Ford gave no explanation though for why it took them just 10 hours to reach their shocking verdict, but said it took a toll on all of them.

"Everyone wonders why we didn't speak to the media right away,"
she said.
"It was because we were sick to our stomach to get that verdict. We were crying and not just the women. It was emotional and we weren't ready."

Ford said they wanted to render a verdict

"with integrity and not contribute to the sensationalism of the trial."

Her remarks echoed those of alternate juror Russell Huekler, who said earlier that

"there was so much reasonable doubt."

Ummm....they didn't think she was innocent?? So why is she getting out FREE possibly tomorrow??

Now she can never be tried again for her daughter's murder because of double jeopardy.



UPDATE:


Juror #3, Jennifer Ford, spoke to Barbara Walters and we have the video below:

WATCH IT FROM YOUR PHONE - HERE!







Here's the problem ... she clearly indicates that the death penalty affected her decision. The jury is NOT supposed to factor in the penalty when deciding the verdict. This was pointed out on CNN's AC360. Furthermore, the jury was questionable according to some observers:

1) None of them took many notes, which is unusual in such a complex case. 2) The decision came back surprisingly quickly for such a complex case. 3) There was no request to read back any testimony, which is again very unusual.

Juror #3 and an alternate juror also said that they thought the father was hiding something. First off, the father was not on trial. Secondly, there were many things he could have been hiding -- including THE KNOWLEDGE OF CASEY's GUILT, or his alleged affair, or many other things that should not invoke "Reasonable Doubt." If you didn't trust the dad, then simply discard his testimony. His trustworthiness has little to do with her guilt.

What could happened now? Can she be re-tried. According to expects, most likely no...unless there was fraud during the jury deliberation.


MORE ON CASEY ANTHONY:


Casey Anthony To Do Porn w/ Vivid Entertainment???

Casey Anthony's Former Fiance` Speaks Out -- Goes Off At Jose Baez & Casey! (VIDEO)


Casey Anthony Juror Says He Will Speak But Only For The BIG Bucks!

Jose Baez & Casey Anthony Defense Team Celebrate At Bar Outside Courthouse So Everyone Can See! Deserved or Tasteless?

No Justice For Baby Caylee --- Mom, Casey Anthony Found NOT Guilty!!!


Days Away From Verdict In Casey Anthony Trial --- Mom Lies On Stand!

BOMBSHELL: Casey Anthony Blames Dad For Daughter's Murder! Watch The Full Trial Opening Statements

Get To Know The Jurors In The Casey Anthony Trial

RAW VIDEO: Casey Anthony Trial: Spectator Flipping Off Attorney

Post a Comment

0 Comments